tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20219340.post5018345095352927593..comments2024-03-11T08:05:41.425-07:00Comments on Disney History: Didier Ghezhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05442745682397929615noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20219340.post-17303070278409607782013-04-08T07:08:15.029-07:002013-04-08T07:08:15.029-07:00I see I made a typo in the first sentence of my co...I see I made a typo in the first sentence of my comment. September 1945, NOT September 1935 as I had written in the first sentence, is teh correct date for this image.Davidhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00656658573895928823noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20219340.post-71446368975814725662013-04-08T00:14:55.494-07:002013-04-08T00:14:55.494-07:00This photo is actually from September 1935. Member...This photo is actually from September 1935. Members of my Hyperion research team identified the image as being taken at the new Burbank Studio, on a piece of land that the Roy O. Disney building would eventually be built on. Howard was going to pull the image and relist it with the proper information. The negative number included on the reverse of the image gives one major clue: "95-1938." The "95" is the month and year the photo was taken, ergo, September, 1945, while the reference to "1938" is not the year, but a negative reference number. I personally learned this many years ago when seeing some of the insignia images at the Company Archives - Dave Smith explained the photo reference number to me back in the late 1980s.DisneyDavehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03177008494595707305noreply@blogger.com