tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20219340.post6872636618900181330..comments2024-03-11T08:05:41.425-07:00Comments on Disney History: Didier Ghezhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05442745682397929615noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20219340.post-82838407300558364452017-02-06T15:30:45.790-08:002017-02-06T15:30:45.790-08:00Auto spell correct makes writers sound like idiots...Auto spell correct makes writers sound like idiots - lol. Last few sentences in previous comment should read: "Makes sense that they would put some minds on the project to investigate and develop the business case. Nice story. Excellent research. Barry Linetskyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17534754850066702061noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20219340.post-34801698643740218522017-02-03T17:50:45.586-08:002017-02-03T17:50:45.586-08:00Parks require rides or attractions, and Disney had...Parks require rides or attractions, and Disney had bought a 30% stake in Arrow in 1960. The strategy of Walt and Roy at the time was strategic synergy. What better way to fuse all of the Disney assets, than small replicable parks. At least in theory. Makes sense that they would put some minds on the reject to investigate no develop the business case. Nice story. Excellent research.<br /><br />Barry Linetsky Barry Linetskyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17534754850066702061noreply@blogger.com